How we transformed a historic estate of exceptional heritage value into an economic activation strategy structured around three business concepts, three activity streams, and a decision-making roadmap designed to navigate a complex regulatory environment.
A large historic estate, set within an outstanding natural environment and located just minutes from a major metropolitan area, combined exceptional heritage value with a level of utilization far below its potential. The family ownership was not asking whether the asset had potential, but which model could successfully unlock it.
The starting point was a unique architectural ensemble—comprising a main building, annex houses, outdoor spaces, gardens, and a substantial built area—with a distinctive identity that would be difficult to replicate. However, it lacked both a sustainable economic activity and a clear strategy for how that activity should be developed.
Complexity was considerable. The asset operated within a demanding regulatory framework, particularly regarding tourism licenses, where different pathways — rural accommodation, tourism use permits, and hotel licenses — offered very different capacities and timelines. Consequently, any business model would need to be built around this uncertainty, rather than in spite of it.
The strategic opportunity was to transform heritage, nature, and metropolitan proximity into a viable operating model. This model needed to respect the character of the estate while enhancing its value and generating economic activity.
“A heritage asset is not valued solely for what it is, but for the model capable of activating it without betraying its essence.”
We structured the project through a phased process: situation assessment, market analysis, concept development, and financial evaluation. This allowed us to progress from a comprehensive understanding of the asset to an actionable proposal without skipping any critical steps.
Firstly, the process began with a detailed physical inventory of the estate. Every floor, building, and accommodation unit was catalogued and documented, distinguishing between spaces already in use and those with latent development potential. Moreover, this asset map became the foundation for assessing which uses were feasible, what investment they would require, and in what sequence they could be implemented.
“We were not looking for a single answer, but for three comparable pathways that would allow the ownership to make an informed decision based on its own priorities.”
At the same time, we conducted an extensive market analysis and benchmarking exercise, reviewing dozens of comparable spaces and business models — event venues, rural hospitality projects, coliving concepts, wellness destinations, and food and beverage experiences. As a result, every idea was tested against real-world references rather than assumptions. We complemented this with a regulatory analysis that organized licensing scenarios into a clear timeline: current conditions, transitional stages, and medium- to long-term objectives.
On this foundation, we developed three differentiated strategic concepts. Each was articulated through the estate’s three activity streams — food and beverage, accommodation, and venue rental — and assessed using a common analytical framework. For each stream and concept, we defined the target market, required space, and operating model. Furthermore, applying the same framework across all concepts transformed three distinct ideas into three genuinely comparable scenarios.
The outcome was not a single recommendation, but three coherent and comparable business concepts. Each had its own identity, yet all were built around the same logic: three complementary activity streams, phased investment, and a model that enhances the asset’s value while generating economic activity.
The first concept positions venue rental and event hosting as the primary economic driver, complemented by accommodation in the annex buildings and a flexible food and beverage offering. Building on this, the second revolves around medium- and long-term accommodation, built around a coliving and coworking model for professionals and creators. The third, meanwhile, creates a wellbeing destination combining accommodation, a local membership club, and a farm-to-table culinary offering.
All three concepts share the same strategic backbone. They respect the regulatory framework, allow operations to begin with scalable investment, and maintain management control in the hands of the ownership. In addition, they rely on specialized operators where these add value.
“A strategy is only implemented when the decision-maker can see themselves in it. That is why we did not deliver a single answer, but three scenarios ready to be chosen.”
In conclusion, the process left the ownership with a lasting asset: a complete and documented inventory of the estate, a body of validated market references, a regulatory roadmap with clear implementation horizons, and a replicable methodology for making decisions and phasing the activation of the asset over time.
Barcelona Office
Antoni Bell 2, 4th Floor – C
Sant Cugat del Vallès 08174
+34 93 280 7084
Madrid Office
Alfonso XII 62, 2nd Floor
Madrid 28014
+34 91 048 8455
To stay up to date on the latest trends and key information in our sectors, follow us
Accessibility Tools